Black Swan Magnet

The Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb is a very important book. Unfortunately, the author’s style leaves much to be desired; I’d call it sandpapery, pretentious, avuncular, sarcastic, unsexy, erudite. But it’s so brilliant that none of that matters…

EXPLICITLY NERDY STUFF

Taleb’s main point is that we suck at predicting the future. We cannot be 100% sure of ANYTHING that will happen.

Social scientists (e.g. economists) model the world with Gaussian curves – normal distributions – however, Taleb argues that this practice is fundamentally fucked because in the real world, the “outliers” (“Black Swans”… most swans are white) account for the vast majority of long-term changes and therefore cannot be discounted. I always intuited that something was up with these suspect curves, and am glad to have the explicit explanation! Taleb classifies the wider class of errors in which models of games do not truly reflect real-life situations as the “Ludic fallacy”.

Although Black Swans appear to be random, that’s only appearances. There’s no such thing as random. Taleb articulates it perfectly when he says that the appearance of randomness simply results from lack of information!

Small variables can have a huge impact; the world is also chaotic and non-linear, making modeling the future a real bitch (incidentally, I was reading Chaos by James Gleick when my friend Matthew interjected and demanded I read The Black Swan). But look: Taleb says we’re also way too arrogant (he calls this “epistemic arrogance”) when we ascribe causality as much as we do. He says we have no idea why things happened in the past the way they did – we have no way of verifying our hypotheses by experimenting against equal set of conditions in the future. Taleb brings back old-school skepticism and empiricism, and thinks that proofs by induction are impossible in the real world. Instead, we must rely on proofs by counter-example (contradiction), using negative space in order to shape our understanding.

In my opinion, this means that the only way to know if you really understand something is if you can repeat results in the future.

Examples of Black Swans: any stock market crash; most world wars; scientists believing formula equivalently healthy to breast milk; the Internet; Twitter; YouTube.

PRACTICAL LESSONS

Sure, Black Swans seem to come out of nowhere, but they can be both positive and negative. We want to minimize our exposure to negative swans but maximize our exposure to positive swans. In the stock market, NNT favors a highly aggressive-highly conservative strategy. This might mean that we should avoid blue chips (that could be easily disrupted by a Black Swan (BS) stock market crash), and instead put the majority of our money into treasury bills, and a little bit into high-risk bets that could blow big (like a Biotech company that could stumble upon a blockbuster drug). The startup seed fund YCombinator is a magnet for Black Swans: they invest a little bit of money into a many startups, hoping to have randomly included the next Google in their portfolio.

I adopt a similar strategy when it comes to my own entrepreneurship: over the past 5 years, I have started at least six significant web application projects. Out of these, four were essentially failures, one was a success (acquisition), and one I am currently working on (though we’re “pivoting”). It’s incredibly difficult to perceive what will be succeed and what won’t; the only way to find out is to put it out there and see how people vote with their attention and wallets.

One more thing I’d like to share: Taleb also admonishes against the “narrative fallacy”, which is our tendency to describe chaotic and complicated events with cohesive stories. He believes that when we do so, we over-emphasize details of little importance and neglect bits that actually had a salient impact. Unfortunately, narrative stories provide a “schema” and enhance understanding as well as encoding of memory, and narratives are more likely to spread because they are so digestible. Just as you can tweak the viral loop for internet properties by trying to make it easy for people to spread your content (adding in an invitation widget), I wonder how you can prepackage your stories to make them more readily digestible by the human mind and increase the likelihood of a meme. Perhaps I should read Made To Stick by Chip Heath.

Anyway, if you want to delve into greater depth on these ideas, check out The Black Swan by Taleb. (N.B. I would call him pretentious if he weren’t so damned accomplished. He made a fortune by betting against the swans in various financial crises; he was close enough with Benoit Mandelbrot to call him up at 2am; etc.) If you want to see how we are bad at predicting our own happiness, you can read my review of Stumbling on Happiness by Dan Gilbert. If you want a more thorough overview of fallacious thinking, I highly endorse the very awesome and very readable Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely.

I’ll follow-up with a post “Making A Black Swan Trap”, complete with blueprints.



Subscribe to the blog via email.

AwesomenessReminders: a great and hilarious way to show someone in your life that you care.
AwesomenessReminders is owned and operated by me, Zachary Burt.



  • http://website-in-a-weekend.net/ Dave Doolin

    I don’t agree with Taleb about stock market crashes. The tragedy there is that really large crashes are more predictable than not. The current situation was predicted by everyone from me, who got my money out in October 2007, to some pretty smart, and completely politically powerless people ranging from everyone at Rockford to Ron Paul.

    Credit is a drug, and it’s one you have to take, or you risk losing social standing. With credit, you can bluff and deceive your way to better mates and better standards of material living for your children. It’s a genetic win.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    I am grateful for your insight on credit being a genetic win .

    However, I am not pleased with your comment disagreeing with Taleb about stock market crashes. This is a common logical fallacy and one that Taleb addresses in TBS: a mixture of hindsight bias, confirmation bias, and selective sample bias. From what I gather from your comment, all you did was withdraw your money. If you were truly confident about your predictions, you would instead have shorted the bank stocks or engaged in some other analogous financial maneuvering.

  • Quietlysitting

    Kind of lost me with calling Taleb pretentious and then telling us how fortunate we are to have you to get the gems from the book. I’ve liked quite a few of your posts. However, I have found some of your own pretense somewhat offputting. Keep up the good work, but if you do have a problem with pretense you may want to work on scrapping it from you’re own writing. Overall though, I like the quality of your blog and writing.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    My point was that instead of having to weave through way too many mentions of the word “Platonicity”, you can get the quick bullets; in that sense I was probably attempting to use contrast as a literary device to build interest. However, it is often said that other people are only mirrors of you, and faults you find in others point to areas that you yourself ought to address. I don’t know who made this discovery – perhaps it was Jung, with his concept of the “shadow” (he’s on my to-read list). But perhaps it is I who am sandpapery, pretentious, avuncular, sarcastic, unsexy, yet erudite… or at least, perhaps I indirectly perceive myself that way.

    So: I would benefit tremendously if you would elaborate on examples of “[my] own pretense” that rubbed you the wrong way. Thanks!

  • http://website-in-a-weekend.net/ Dave Doolin

    I don't agree with Taleb about stock market crashes. The tragedy there is that really large crashes are more predictable than not. The current situation was predicted by everyone from me, who got my money out in October 2007, to some pretty smart, and completely politically powerless people ranging from everyone at Rockford to Ron Paul.

    Credit is a drug, and it's one you have to take, or you risk losing social standing. With credit, you can bluff and deceive your way to better mates and better standards of material living for your children. It's a genetic win.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    I am grateful for your insight on credit being a genetic win .

    However, I am not pleased with your comment disagreeing with Taleb about stock market crashes. This is a common logical fallacy and one that Taleb addresses in TBS: a mixture of hindsight bias, confirmation bias, and selective sample bias. From what I gather from your comment, all you did was withdraw your money. If you were truly confident about your predictions, you would instead have shorted the bank stocks or engaged in some other analogous financial maneuvering.

  • http://www.facebook.com/polarix Gregory Perkins

    Bart Kosko has a great discussion of the fallacy of the Gaussian, and its proper replacement, in his book “Noise”. I gather it is from a slightly more mathematical perspective.Taleb’s supposed “epistemic arrogance” reminds me of David Deutsch’s argument in “The Fabric of Reality”: what we are fundamentally looking for is not a mathematical theory that extrapolates perfectly, but an explanation that accords both with evidence and with our pre-existing epistemological situation. Highly recommend that book, though it’s relatively dense.Could the “Black Swan” just be a new piece of evidence that forces us to reconsider our prior explanations?

  • Quietlysitting

    Kind of lost me with calling Taleb pretentious and then telling us how fortunate we are to have you to get the gems from the book. I've liked quite a few of your posts. However, I have found some of your own pretense somewhat offputting. Keep up the good work, but if you do have a problem with pretense you may want to work on scrapping it from you're own writing. Overall though, I like the quality of your blog and writing.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    My point was that instead of having to weave through way too many mentions of the word “Platonicity”, you can get the quick bullets; in that sense I was probably attempting to use contrast as a literary device to build interest. However, it is often said though that other people are only mirrors of you, and faults you find in others point to areas that you yourself ought to address, so perhaps it is I who am sandpapery, pretentious, avuncular, sarcastic, unsexy, yet erudite… or at least, perhaps I secretly perceive myself as such. Anyway, I would benefit tremendously if you would specifically elaborate on examples of “[my] own pretense” that rubbed you the wrong way. Do you mind?

  • http://www.facebook.com/polarix Gregory Perkins

    Bart Kosko has a great discussion of the fallacy of the Gaussian, and its proper replacement, in his book “Noise”. I gather it is from a slightly more mathematical perspective.

    Taleb's supposed “epistemic arrogance” smacks of a Popperian mis-step somewhere along the line. In fact, as David Deutsch explains in “The Fabric of Reality”, what we are fundamentally looking for is not a mathematical theory that extrapolates perfectly, but an explanation that accords both with evidence and with our pre-existing epistemological situation. Highly recommend that book, though it's relatively dense.

    Could the “Black Swan” just be a new piece of evidence that forces us to reconsider our prior explanations?

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/06/competing-with-greyhound-my-nycchicago-bus-venture/ Competing with Greyhound: My NYC/Chicago Bus Venture — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] with Greyhound: My NYC/Chicago Bus VentureBlack Swan MagnetRELEASE YOURSELF TO THE CHURCH! TO THE STATE! TO APPLE CORPORATION! Or Flow.Operating Manual for [...]

  • ben

    I’m not sure what good it does to claim that there’s no such thing as random AND that the world is chaotic, non-linear, unpredictable. Second, of course you must realize that his business about “narrative fallacy” is disingenuous, given that you’ve already just smuggled several narratives in (“the ‘outliers’ account for the vast majority of long-term changes”, “the appearance of randomness simply results from lack of information”, “the only way to know if you really understand something is if you can repeat results in the future”) — these all betray a narrated account of things. Understanding is always essentially a narration of the world…

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    “I’m not sure what good it does to claim that there’s no such thing as random AND that the world is chaotic, non-linear, unpredictable.”If you are saying that chaotic, non-linear, and unpredictable is for most intents and purposes the same thing as randomness, then I probably agree. The point was to show how a concept of randomness can exist in a deterministic framework. “of course you must realize that his business about “narrative fallacy” is disingenuous, given that you’ve already just smuggled several narratives”Maybe more of a rhetorical catch (enantiodromia) than a logical objection: I disagree, and I think Taleb would too. The narrative fallacy suggests that many (not all) explanations are wrong albeit conveniently wrapped up in narratives. “Understanding is always essentially a narration of the world”The Buddhists/Zen masters/Eckhart Tolle club would disagree with you here. They believe that true understanding arises when narration ceases. Perhaps such perspective fits into the framework offered by Taleb?

  • ben

    I'm not sure what good it does to claim that there's no such thing as random AND that the world is chaotic, non-linear, unpredictable. Second, of course you must realize that his business about “narrative fallacy” is disingenuous, given that you've already just smuggled several narratives in (“the 'outliers' account for the vast majority of long-term changes”, “the appearance of randomness simply results from lack of information”, “the only way to know if you really understand something is if you can repeat results in the future”) — these all betray a narrated account of things. Understanding is always essentially a narration of the world…

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    “I'm not sure what good it does to claim that there's no such thing as random AND that the world is chaotic, non-linear, unpredictable.”

    If you are saying that chaotic, non-linear, and unpredictable is for most intents and purposes the same thing as randomness, then I probably agree. The point was to show how a concept of randomness can exist in a deterministic framework.

    “of course you must realize that his business about “narrative fallacy” is disingenuous, given that you've already just smuggled several narratives”

    Maybe more of a rhetorical catch (enantiodromia) than a logical objection: I disagree, and I think Taleb would too. The narrative fallacy suggests that many (not all) explanations are wrong albeit conveniently wrapped up in narratives.

    “Understanding is always essentially a narration of the world”

    The Buddhists/Zen masters/Eckhart Tolle club would disagree with you here. They believe that true understanding arises when narration ceases. Perhaps such perspective fits into the framework offered by Taleb?

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    You are wrong. Taleb is hardly pretentious. In fact when you watch him on various videos, e.g., Ted.com, he is thoroughly UNPRETENTIOUS–ditto for his wardrobe. Avuncular is a bit off the mark too, maybe like a “seasoned” uncle (but still cool) is closer to the truth. Unsexy? really? I didn’t know sexiness was an important criteria for your entertainment?

    I wish that my Father or uncle for that matter was as “spot-on” as Taleb. His analaysis, which included calling the bankers “charlatans” was as needed as his sobriety. I believe that comment showed tremendous courage and, gasp, could almost be considered sexy too when we consider that jousting with economic theories, hedge fund zealots and trillions of dollars was on the line.
    The largest exchange of wealth in the history of modern economies (of all time?) shifted during this period. Taleb is to be given credit for not acting like some chest thumping Mad Money Cramer when he called the market perfectly-Kudos for his “sandpapery” delivery too.

    You must have missed his recounting of his life in war torn Lebanon where he shares his disdain for pretentious “James Bond types”. We are indebted to Taleb for his wisdom–something that comes through experience and TIME–a thing that is, unfortunately, missing from this post due to its glib opener.

    Btw, I believe that your friend Matthew made available both Gleick’s Chaos and Taleb’s Black Swann simultaneously for your benefit not more than a week ago, since he felt that they were highly complementary to read together. He learned this from his own EXPERIENCE and from actually DEEPLY READING both these books.

    *Btw, “Made To Stick”, a book that I own and enjoy will no doubt quench your sexiness desire as it is a slick handbook for how to obtain the attention of others. This book, which was released a year and a half after Gladwell’s Blink and right before Taleb’s B Swann is the natural result of our information driven times. The funny thing is that the publishers who designed the book jacket chose the color orange as the sleeve color; a color that has been shown in color analysis to be NOT sticky –more later.

    –Matthew Swann

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    You are wrong. Taleb is hardly pretentious. In fact when you watch him on various videos, e.g., Ted.com, he is thoroughly UNPRETENTIOUS–ditto for his wardrobe. Avuncular is a bit off the mark too, maybe like a “seasoned” uncle (but still cool) is closer to the truth. Unsexy? really? I didn't know sexiness was an important criteria for your entertainment?

    I wish that my Father or uncle for that matter was as “spot-on” as Taleb. His analaysis, which included calling the bankers “charlatans” was as needed as his sobriety. I believe that comment showed tremendous courage and, gasp, could almost be considered sexy too when we consider that jousting with economic theories, hedge fund zealots and trillions of dollars was on the line.
    The largest exchange of wealth in the history of modern economies (of all time?) shifted during this period. Taleb is to be given credit for not acting like some chest thumping Mad Money Cramer when he called the market perfectly-Kudos for his “sandpapery” delivery too.

    You must have missed his recounting of his life in war torn Lebanon where he shares his disdain for pretentious “James Bond types”. We are indebted to Taleb for his wisdom–something that comes through experience and TIME–a thing that is, unfortunately, missing from this post due to its glib opener.

    Btw, I believe that your friend Matthew made available both Gleick's Chaos and Taleb's Black Swann simultaneously for your benefit not more than a week ago, since he felt that they were highly complementary to read together. He learned this from his own EXPERIENCE and from actually DEEPLY READING both these books.

    *Btw, “Made To Stick”, a book that I own and enjoy will no doubt quench your sexiness desire as it is a slick handbook for how to obtain the attention of others. This book, which was released a year and a half after Gladwell's Blink and right before Taleb's B Swann is the natural result of our information driven times. The funny thing is that the publishers who designed the book jacket chose the color orange as the sleeve color; a color that has been shown in color analysis to be NOT sticky –more later.

    –Matthew Swann

  • Matthew Swann

    Zach,
    The word “platonicity” is used correctly and relates to the overall re-expression of certain types of information fields and how they are interpreted as outlined in the Black Swann, which happen to date in western thought to the time of Plato. (I’m sure the dynamic itself predates Plato too)

    Taleb, does attempt an easy to understand re-categorization of event/information types e.g., Black, White and Grey Swans in his book. He is showing the historical lineage and perspectival habit via this word. SO, he has spoon fed you BOTH the underlying historical dynamic as well as giving you the easy to regurge color categories.

    No pretense at all or anything else you delinquently accused him of.

    HAVE YOU CONSIDERED HOW HIS “PERSONA” PLAYS AGAINST THE COLLECTIVE “BULL MARKET’ MENDACITY OF THE PAST DECADE’S WALL STREET CROONERS? He is an example of an oppositional voice. Imagine, he is an example of the very thing he writes about –wake up Zach.

    I sense a bit of “shadow malice” in your personal statement against Taleb and possibly older people in general–older MALES perhaps?
    Taleb is in many ways your opposite: mature, seasoned, experienced, and grown up. I sense an Oedipal reflex here on your part.

    Some books deserve to be READ not simply speed read and thrown up on a blog in bullet points. The dynamic in which Taleb (and Gleick) write about is ancient and persistent. It deserves thought not smart ass glib commentary, which has the cumulative effect of announcing Zachary Burt as possibly sarcastic and PRETENTIOUS. You do no one (least of all yourself) any favors or “luck” by “mining” the book for “insights”. The smart set will see right through this commentary and you. Other audience will chose NOT to read this book because of your slanted comments.

    Finally, for those of us that lived through the go-go bull market widened times of the last 16 years and the almost nonexistent recognition of opposing voices Taleb is necessary ballast.

    –Matthew Swann

    This nonsense about people being mirrors of ourselves comes off as sounding disingenuous. You can discern between yourself and others (comments too). Your parasympathetic (and sympathetic) nervous system isn’t so “abstracted” so as to not be able to tell the difference, otherwise you would be able to make the statement to begin with–ENOUGH.

  • Matthew Swann

    AN ERROR AND CORRECTION
    The following comment that I write above: “Your parasympathetic… otherwise you would be able to make the statement to begin with–ENOUGH.” should read: “wouldn’t be able to make the statement to begin with.” rather than “would be able…”–please excuse,
    Thank you
    Matthew Swann
    (Any other grammar mistakes please excuse im typing as fast as Zachary Burt reads. (The comma after Taleb was an error too.)

  • Matthew Swann

    AN ERROR AND CORRECTION
    The following comment that I write above: “Your parasympathetic… otherwise you would be able to make the statement to begin with–ENOUGH.” should read: “wouldn't be able to make the statement to begin with.” rather than “would be able…”–please excuse,
    Thank you
    Matthew Swann
    (Any other grammar mistakes please excuse im typing as fast as Zachary Burt reads. (The comma after Taleb was an error too.)

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    Is this the best summary you could muster on Black Swanns?

    “Examples of Black Swans: any stock market crash; most world wars; scientists believing formula equivalently healthy to breast milk; the Internet; Twitter; YouTube.”
    WHAT OF RECENT September 11th aka 9/11 infamy? –A real Black Swann by any estimation–COME ON! You live in Manhattan now.

    Terrorism as a defining feature of our geo-political lives is now very real as it delivers Black Swann type events with terrifying infrequency. (please don’t attempt to couch 9/11 under “World Wars”.)
    An opportunity was lost to denote was was so evident and to many in New York, heart wrenching.
    A bit “thin” on your part I submit.
    –M SWANN

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    Perfectly stated concerning Doolin’s comment. I have found many others who besides withdrawing their money in 2007 quoted Karl Marx and his criticisms of Capitalism through this period too.
    MS

  • Matthew Swann

    Correction:
    Should read “what was so evident” not “was was so evident.”
    Thanks
    MS

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    Perfectly stated concerning Doolin's comment. I have found many others who besides withdrawing their money in 2007 quoted Karl Marx and his criticisms of Capitalism through this period too.
    MS

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    Perfectly stated concerning Doolin's comment. I have found many others who besides withdrawing their money in 2007 quoted Karl Marx and his criticisms of Capitalism through this period too.
    MS

  • Matthew Swann

    Correction:
    Should read “what was so evident” not “was was so evident.”
    Thanks
    MS

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    1) It seems that it’s true what they say. No gift goes unpunished.

    2) You make some good points and I think you are spot on about me being envious of Taleb. Of course he is more successful than I am, and more learned too – I was especially bristled by his claim that dropping the habit of reading the newspaper enabled him to read an extra 100 books per year. Certainly my treacherous ego became involved and fostered some perceptual distortions; c.f. my glib laundry list of negative descriptors, upon reflecting I do not think that he is actually pretentious. I will try to be more aware of such bias in the future as well as be more precise in my diction.

    3) That doesn’t mean that I think he’s a good writer. Let’s take the example of Platonicity. He harps on Platonicity for far too long before giving it a proper introduction. Readers have better comprehension when introduced to facts in a relatable schema. I also did not enjoy the book. I thought it was too long. Maybe that was due to a sense of urgency – I was trying to meet some personal goals for the blog, for June. (I succeeded in those goals, and will simmer down a bit for July).

    4) I don’t think that the autonomic nervous system has anything to do with “liking” or the intricacies of the ego but I would love to hear more about your basis for such a theory.

    5) I did not live in New York in 2001 and I did not personally suffer any great emotional injury from the stock market crash. I do appreciate the 9/11 tip from a social perspective, it is not the first time I have made the faux pas of failing to appreciate its emotional impact. I am sorry. It sucked. And yes, it is especially relevant as a Black Swan when you consider the draconian and stupid counter-terrorism measures courtesy of the TSA.

    6) I promise to re-read The Black Swan and give it an additional, more thoughtful treatment on the blog.

  • Matthew Swann

    Zach,
    The word “platonicity” is used correctly and relates to the overall re-expression of certain types of information fields and how they are interpreted as outlined in the Black Swann, which happen to date in western thought to the time of Plato. (I'm sure the dynamic itself predates Plato too)

    Taleb, does attempt an easy to understand re-categorization of event/information types e.g., Black, White and Grey Swans in his book. He is showing the historical lineage and perspectival habit via this word. SO, he has spoon fed you BOTH the underlying historical dynamic as well as giving you the easy to regurge color categories.

    No pretense at all or anything else you delinquently accused him of.

    HAVE YOU CONSIDERED HOW HIS “PERSONA” PLAYS AGAINST THE COLLECTIVE “BULL MARKET' MENDACITY OF THE PAST DECADE'S WALL STREET CROONERS? He is an example of an oppositional voice. Imagine, he is an example of the very thing he writes about –wake up Zach.

    I sense a bit of “shadow malice” in your personal statement against Taleb and possibly older people in general–older MALES perhaps?
    Taleb is in many ways your opposite: mature, seasoned, experienced, and grown up. I sense an Oedipal reflex here on your part.

    Some books deserve to be READ not simply speed read and thrown up on a blog in bullet points. The dynamic in which Taleb (and Gleick) write about is ancient and persistent. It deserves thought not smart ass glib commentary, which has the cumulative effect of announcing Zachary Burt as possibly sarcastic and PRETENTIOUS. You do no one (least of all yourself) any favors or “luck” by “mining” the book for “insights”. The smart set will see right through this commentary and you. Other audience will chose NOT to read this book because of your slanted comments.

    Finally, for those of us that lived through the go-go bull market widened times of the last 16 years and the almost nonexistent recognition of opposing voices Taleb is necessary ballast.

    –Matthew Swann

    This nonsense about people being mirrors of ourselves comes off as sounding disingenuous. You can discern between yourself and others (comments too). Your parasympathetic (and sympathetic) nervous system isn't so “abstracted” so as to not be able to tell the difference, otherwise you would be able to make the statement to begin with–ENOUGH.

  • Matthew Swann

    AN ERROR AND CORRECTION
    The following comment that I write above: “Your parasympathetic… otherwise you would be able to make the statement to begin with–ENOUGH.” should read: “wouldn't be able to make the statement to begin with.” rather than “would be able…”–please excuse,
    Thank you
    Matthew Swann
    (Any other grammar mistakes please excuse im typing as fast as Zachary Burt reads. (The comma after Taleb was an error too.)

  • Matthew Swann

    Zachary,
    Is this the best summary you could muster on Black Swanns?

    “Examples of Black Swans: any stock market crash; most world wars; scientists believing formula equivalently healthy to breast milk; the Internet; Twitter; YouTube.”
    WHAT OF RECENT September 11th aka 9/11 infamy? –A real Black Swann by any estimation–COME ON! You live in Manhattan now.

    Terrorism as a defining feature of our geo-political lives is now very real as it delivers Black Swann type events with terrifying infrequency. (please don't attempt to couch 9/11 under “World Wars”.)
    An opportunity was lost to denote was was so evident and to many in New York, heart wrenching.
    A bit “thin” on your part I submit.
    –M SWANN

  • Matthew Swann

    Correction:
    Should read “what was so evident” not “was was so evident.”
    Thanks
    MS

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    1) It seems that it's true what they say. No gift goes unpunished.

    2) You make some good points and I think you are spot on about me being envious of Taleb. Of course he is more successful than I am, and more learned too – I was especially bristled by his claim that dropping the habit of reading the newspaper enabled him to read an extra 100 books per year. Certainly my treacherous ego became involved and fostered some perceptual distortions; c.f. my glib laundry list of negative descriptors, upon reflecting I do not think that he is actually pretentious. I will try to be more aware of such bias in the future as well as be more precise in my diction.

    3) That doesn't mean that I think he's a good writer. Let's take the example of Platonicity. He harps on Platonicity for far too long before giving it a proper introduction. Readers have better comprehension when introduced to facts in a relatable schema. I also did not enjoy the book. I thought it was too long. Maybe that was due to a sense of urgency – I was trying to meet some personal goals for the blog, for June. (I succeeded in those goals, and will simmer down a bit for July).

    4) I don't think that the autonomic nervous system has anything to do with “liking” or the intricacies of the ego but I would love to hear more about your basis for such a theory.

    5) I did not live in New York in 2001 and I did not personally suffer any great emotional injury from the stock market crash. I do appreciate the 9/11 tip from a social perspective, it is not the first time I have made the faux pas of failing to appreciate its emotional impact. I am sorry. It sucked. And yes, it is especially relevant as a Black Swan when you consider the draconian and stupid counter-terrorism measures courtesy of the TSA.

    6) I promise to re-read The Black Swan and give it an additional, more thoughtful treatment on the blog.

  • Badi

    Hello,

    I invite you to visit my blogs that are dedicated to the Black Swans :

    http://stock-swans.blogspot.com

    http://black-swan-fx-trader.blogspot.com

    Regards

  • Matthew Swann

    FIVE RIPOSTES FOR ZACHARY BURT

    1) My reply was intended to redirect attention to Taleb’s content while showing that his “style” could be viewed as an example of countervailing spirit–opposite to that of the blowhards on CNBC for example and also to redirect you to the various comments from others who took umbrage at your glibness. This style, again to repeat, could be viewed from the perspective of the dualistic dynamic in which Taleb writes about.

    2) As for his “style” (and content usage) that you don’t believe qualifies him as a “good” writer, I believe the 2.7 MILLION copies of The Black Swann SOLD honks for itself. “Platonicity” has a near 2600 year history and is also used in academic circles to denote a particular tendency. I believe that Taleb’s use of this word could be EXPANDED.
    (His other top selling titles are worth checking out too–Fooled By Randomness” is a good one. http://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-Chance-Markets/dp/1587990717

    3) The humor that I typically imbue my comments with didn’t come through to your satisfaction –MY APOLOGIES!
    The inclusion of Para/ Sympathetic nervous system, which is responsible for the fight or flight response, and much of our “Gut” thinking came off flat. If there is such a thing as “pre-conscious thinking” it is to be found emanating from our nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system is responsible for up- and down-regulating many homeostatic mechanisms in living organisms. Fibers from the SNS innervate tissues IN ALMOST EVERY ORGAN SYSTEM, providing at least some regulatory function to things as diverse as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. It is perhaps best known for mediating the neuronal and hormonal stress response commonly known as the FIGHT OR FLIGHT response. This response is also known as sympatho-adrenal response of the body, as the preganglionic sympathetic fibers that end in the adrenal medulla (but also all other sympathetic fibers) secrete acetylcholine, which activates the great secretion of adrenaline (epinephrine) and to a lesser extent noradrenaline (norepinephrine) from it. Therefore, this response that acts primarily on the CADIOVASCULAR system is mediated directly via impulses transmitted through the sympathetic nervous system and indirectly via catecholamines secreted from the adrenal medulla.
    Suggested reading: “The Second Brain” Michael Gershon.http://www.amazon.com/Second-Brain-Groundbreaking-Understanding-Disorders/dp/0060930721
    Here is a link too http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/gsas/anatomy/Faculty/Gershon/
    At a later point in the PSNS and SNS system’s reach (since they are the red light/green light function at its most basic level in the organism) the organism “decides” to mirror and adapt to the presence of a friend or foe–Your gut and heart instinct essentially.
    I will work on my clownish biological delivery.

    4) Concerning the omission of the 9-11 tragedy from your list of Black Swanns: You still don’t get it–It doesn’t matter whether you were here or not in Manhattan. It is of recent occurrence and its MAGNITUDE could have bolstered your own writing, thus “lost opportunity”. Some people belive that this event ushered in a NEW ERA! It is the closest macro Black Swann to our present day.
    Your comment shows a tendency toward a troubling solipsism though–Thanks for the apology nonetheless.
    5) Your opening “gift comment” deserves commentary on an email not here on the blog.
    –Matthew Swann

  • Matthew Swann

    FIVE RIPOSTES FOR ZACHARY BURT

    1) My reply was intended to redirect attention to Taleb’s content while showing that his “style” could be viewed as an example of countervailing spirit–opposite to that of the blowhards on CNBC for example and also to redirect you to the various comments from others who took umbrage at your glibness. This style, again to repeat, could be viewed from the perspective of the dualistic dynamic in which Taleb writes about.

    2) As for his “style” (and content usage) that you don’t believe qualifies him as a “good” writer, I believe the 2.7 MILLION copies of The Black Swann SOLD honks for itself. “Platonicity” has a near 2600 year history and is also used in academic circles to denote a particular tendency. I believe that Taleb’s use of this word could be EXPANDED.
    (His other top selling titles are worth checking out too–Fooled By Randomness” is a good one. http://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-Chance-Markets/dp/1587990717

    3) The humor that I typically imbue my comments with didn’t come through to your satisfaction –MY APOLOGIES!
    The inclusion of Para/ Sympathetic nervous system, which is responsible for the fight or flight response, and much of our “Gut” thinking came off flat. If there is such a thing as “pre-conscious thinking” it is to be found emanating from our nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system is responsible for up- and down-regulating many homeostatic mechanisms in living organisms. Fibers from the SNS innervate tissues IN ALMOST EVERY ORGAN SYSTEM, providing at least some regulatory function to things as diverse as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. It is perhaps best known for mediating the neuronal and hormonal stress response commonly known as the FIGHT OR FLIGHT response. This response is also known as sympatho-adrenal response of the body, as the preganglionic sympathetic fibers that end in the adrenal medulla (but also all other sympathetic fibers) secrete acetylcholine, which activates the great secretion of adrenaline (epinephrine) and to a lesser extent noradrenaline (norepinephrine) from it. Therefore, this response that acts primarily on the CADIOVASCULAR system is mediated directly via impulses transmitted through the sympathetic nervous system and indirectly via catecholamines secreted from the adrenal medulla.
    Suggested reading: “The Second Brain” Michael Gershon.http://www.amazon.com/Second-Brain-Groundbreaking-Understanding-Disorders/dp/0060930721
    Here is a link too http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/gsas/anatomy/Faculty/Gershon/
    At a later point in the PSNS and SNS system’s reach (since they are the red light/green light function at its most basic level in the organism) the organism “decides” to mirror and adapt to the presence of a friend or foe–Your gut and heart instinct essentially.
    I will work on my clownish biological delivery.

    4) Concerning the omission of the 9-11 tragedy from your list of Black Swanns: You still don’t get it–It doesn’t matter whether you were here or not in Manhattan. It is of recent occurrence and its MAGNITUDE could have bolstered your own writing, thus “lost opportunity”. Some people belive that this event ushered in a NEW ERA! It is the closest macro Black Swann to our present day.
    Your comment shows a tendency toward a troubling solipsism though–Thanks for the apology nonetheless.
    5) Your opening “gift comment” deserves commentary on an email not here on the blog.
    –Matthew Swann

  • Matthew Swann

    To paraphrase Hegel:

    “The owl of Minerva flies at dusk.”

    In philosophical terms, one can be wise only after the event. It was Hegel’s memorable aphorism that reminds us of 20/20 hindsight vision.

    My comment was a jest. The fact is that I actually did hear quite a few comments quoting Marx AFTER the financial fallout.
    -MS

  • Matthew Swann

    To paraphrase Hegel:

    “The owl of Minerva flies at dusk.”

    In philosophical terms, one can be wise only after the event. It was Hegel’s memorable aphorism that reminds us of 20/20 hindsight vision.

    My comment was a jest. The fact is that I actually did hear quite a few comments quoting Marx AFTER the financial fallout.
    -MS

  • Badi

    Hello,

    I invite you to visit my blogs that are dedicated to the Black Swans :

    http://stock-swans.blogspot.com

    http://black-swan-fx-trader.blogspot.com

    Regards

  • Matthew Swann

    FIVE RIPOSTES FOR ZACHARY BURT

    1) My reply was intended to redirect attention to Taleb's content while showing that his “style” could be viewed as an example of countervailing spirit–opposite to that of the blowhards on CNBC for example and also to redirect you to the various comments from others who took umbrage at your glibness. This style, again to repeat, could be viewed from the perspective of the dualistic dynamic in which Taleb writes about.

    2) As for his “style” (and content usage) that you don't believe qualifies him as a “good” writer, I believe the 2.7 MILLION copies of The Black Swann SOLD honks for itself. “Platonicity” has a near 2600 year history and is also used in academic circles to denote a particular tendency. I believe that Taleb's use of this word could be EXPANDED.
    (His other top selling titles are worth checking out too–Fooled By Randomness” is a good one. http://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Randomness-Hidden-…

    3) The humor that I typically imbue my comments with didn't come through to your satisfaction –MY APOLOGIES!
    The inclusion of Para/ Sympathetic nervous system, which is responsible for the fight or flight response, and much of our “Gut” thinking came off flat. If there is such a thing as “pre-conscious thinking” it is to be found emanating from our nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system is responsible for up- and down-regulating many homeostatic mechanisms in living organisms. Fibers from the SNS innervate tissues IN ALMOST EVERY ORGAN SYSTEM, providing at least some regulatory function to things as diverse as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. It is perhaps best known for mediating the neuronal and hormonal stress response commonly known as the FIGHT OR FLIGHT response. This response is also known as sympatho-adrenal response of the body, as the preganglionic sympathetic fibers that end in the adrenal medulla (but also all other sympathetic fibers) secrete acetylcholine, which activates the great secretion of adrenaline (epinephrine) and to a lesser extent noradrenaline (norepinephrine) from it. Therefore, this response that acts primarily on the CADIOVASCULAR system is mediated directly via impulses transmitted through the sympathetic nervous system and indirectly via catecholamines secreted from the adrenal medulla.
    Suggested reading: “The Second Brain” Michael Gershon.http://www.amazon.com/Second-Brain-Groundbreaking-Understanding-Disorders/dp/0060930721
    Here is a link too http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/dept/gsas/anatomy/…
    At a later point in the PSNS and SNS system's reach (since they are the red light/green light function at its most basic level in the organism) the organism “decides” to mirror and adapt to the presence of a friend or foe–Your gut and heart instinct essentially.
    I will work on my clownish biological delivery.

    4) Concerning the omission of the 9-11 tragedy from your list of Black Swanns: You still don't get it–It doesn't matter whether you were here or not in Manhattan. It is of recent occurrence and its MAGNITUDE could have bolstered your own writing, thus “lost opportunity”. Some people belive that this event ushered in a NEW ERA! It is the closest macro Black Swann to our present day.
    Your comment shows a tendency toward a troubling solipsism though–Thanks for the apology nonetheless.
    5) Your opening “gift comment” deserves commentary on an email not here on the blog.
    –Matthew Swann

  • Matthew Swann

    To paraphrase Hegel:

    “The owl of Minerva flies at dusk.”

    In philosophical terms, one can be wise only after the event. It was Hegel's memorable aphorism that reminds us of 20/20 hindsight vision.

    My comment was a jest. The fact is that I actually did hear quite a few comments quoting Marx AFTER the financial fallout.
    -MS

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/07/understanding-cognitive-surplus-and-television-for-smoother-social-apps/ Understanding Cognitive Surplus and Television for Smoother Social Apps — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] of FreedomZen and the Art of PokerCompeting with Greyhound: My NYC/Chicago Bus Thought ExperimentBlack Swan MagnetRELEASE YOURSELF TO THE CHURCH! TO THE STATE! TO APPLE CORPORATION! Or Flow.Operating Manual for [...]

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/08/social-warfare/ Social Warfare — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] The ambiguity and inherent uncertainty of war mandates us to take action based on incomplete information. Colin Powell espouses a philosophy of taking action when you have information that predicts a 40-70% likelihood of success. Of course, the authors of Warfighting are quick to point out that “it is precisely those actions that seem improbably that often have the greatest impact on the outcome of war”. Ahh… we have been revisited by our old friend The Black Swan. [...]

  • http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com Zbigniew Lukasiak

    For a sceptical view on Talebs theories see http://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/review-of-talebs-black-swan.html and then the multiple updates – like this one: http://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/nassims-selective-returns.html

    My impression is that what Taleb sells is packaging some pretty obvious stuff with complicated maths – so that people after reading his works can think that they learned something very profound.

  • http://perlalchemy.blogspot.com Zbigniew Lukasiak

    For a sceptical view on Talebs theories see http://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/review-of-talebs-black-swan.html and then the multiple updates – like this one: http://falkenblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/nassims-selective-returns.html

    My impression is that what Taleb sells is packaging some pretty obvious stuff with complicated maths – so that people after reading his works can think that they learned something very profound.

Back to top