RELEASE YOURSELF TO THE CHURCH! TO THE STATE! TO APPLE CORPORATION! Or Flow.

There’s a lot of buzz about how ridiculous it is that people are waiting in 10 hours to get Apple’s new iPhone. How lucky for me that I have just recently been reading Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Also, I’ve now discussed and read him enough that I can finally spell his name without having to look it up. Let’s first talk about some important ideas that he offers.

Even though civilization has been getting increasingly advanced, we aren’t getting any happier. People spend their lives working for a future, and when it arrives, they say WAIT A MINUTE – what happened to the LIFE I was supposed to be living? Surely this couldn’t be ALL THERE IS? So some of them turn to drugs and alcohol in response to their frustration. I know I did for a long time – and probably will continue to do so in the future, from time to time. Others become spiritual seekers, going through Landmark Education, spending years in monasteries, attending personal development workshops by Steve Pavlina, changing their name and growing their hair out and doing Yoga. They attempt to apply eastern teachings that made sense thousands of years ago to help them deal with the bullshit circumstance of modern America.

So what do we do if we want to be happy?? We’re kind of FUCKED, aren’t we?

Sort of.

I need to get into theory to explain it better.

I’ve been talking a lot about the ego here on this blog. And Csikszentmihalyi presented some ideas that really enhanced my understanding of it. (how funny, because enhancement is such a dualistic notion, but fuck it, let’s get real, I’m not enlightened yet). Here’s how I currently understand the ego:

self image, identity, ego, attention, experience, and happiness

Hopefully my drawing skills will improve once I finish the Ekman book on microexpressions

We have an ego/self-image that revolves around a set of goals getting completed. Therefore, the ego almost always lives in the past or the future, not the present moment. The ego constantly filters attention for things that are in line with its beliefs. Our experience, which is shaped by attention, then either satisfies the desires of the ego, or it fails to satisfy the desires of the ego. If it succeeds – then we win and experience an incredible high. If not, however, we are filled with pain. Horrible suffering.

Typically, we are not actually in control over our ego and goals. They are set for us by society and social conditioning. This is either our cultural context or our life history. In communist Russia, the ego goals might be to work in the factory in service to the state. Unfortunately, this is a really shitty goal because it does not provide opportunity for happiness (goals of the state aren’t aligned with personal biological drives; Emile Durkheim would call this anomie). And the work provided doesn’t encourage flow. More on flow in a second, though, because there’s something I want to address first: a comment on Hacker News.

Apart from the developers [who lined up to buy the iPhone because it gives them a competitive business advantage], does it hint at a certain emptiness in those people’s lives?

Yes, it does, but it’s unfair to single them out as a group. They are simply satisfying a certain identity criterion: if they have the phone, it works into their ego self image of somebody who has the phone; they are part of their tribe. The exact same game is played by people who drink alcohol and then enjoy the ritual of complaining about their hangovers the next morning. So how do we form these ego images? By the psychological principle of shaping.

Shaping: when little bits of behavior are rewarded over time, chained together to create entirely new complex behavior, ultimately evoked through the LAW OF EFFECT [behavior that leads to pleasure is encouraged, behavior that leads to pain is discouraged].

Gross oversimplification, but tell me it’s not accurate: You’re a successful young adult. You go to the bars and try to hang out with one group of people with lots of cultural capital, but you get snubbed. You hang out more with the Geeks, they accept you, technology is valued in their subculture, so if you want to be popular in your group you try to make sure you are excellent with technology. This might include making sure you are one of the first to get the iPhone. Social acceptance yields elevated dopamine in the striatum, an area of the brain largely responsible for reward and motivation.

OK, OK- so we’re all slaves to our arbitrary self-image/identity. Different self-images might be evaluated as more desirable than others depending on the external rewards that they deliver and the ease of facilitating validation of self-image. For example, a self-image of a healthy athlete might be good because it would motivate you to exercise and therefore extend your life, but a self-image of a beautiful person might be bad because unless you’re actually beautiful you’re not going to get any external validation and you’re going to be living an awful life filled with rationalizations; either way, getting old will be a real bitch, too.

The biggest problem with reliance on self-image to be happy is that most self-images require external validation and your level of happiness is going to be a sinusoidal rollercoaster depending on how the unpredictable chaotic environment is treating you. So what SHOULD you do, practically speaking? Try to give yourself a self-image of something motivated by things that you CAN control, such as taking action. Make friends with people who support and validate this new identity.  Try to find self-esteem by grounding yourself in reality – something that the vast majority of people simply don’t do. How can one find this elusive self-esteem? A partial answer is to control the thoughts that go into your head.

All day long we are bombarded by inaccurate thoughts and judgments, and they make us unhappy. If they’re irrational, they’re distorted by the ego. Correcting irrationalities helps destroy the ego. In MeditationsMarcus Aurelius writes, “If you are pained by external things, it is not they that disturb you, but your own judgment of them. And it is in your power to wipe out that judgment now.” Wow, wise, but a lot easier said than done.. our minds are entrenched with strong neural wirings of thoughts we’ve had on automatic repeat for years. I’m currently working on a FREE WEB APP to help you combat automatic negative thoughts and change the contents of your mind and therefore your reality. I’m devoting a lot of effort to this because I think this is something that can actually improve our lives. In psychiatry, it is known as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and has been demonstrated equally effective as LEXAPRO in treating depression. Of course, I will post it to this blog when it is ready.

But let’s get back to FLOW because there’s a lot to talk about. Remember how I said yes- we’re kind of fucked if we want to be happy – that’s not entirely true. There are things we can do; we can find pleasure and we can find enjoyment.

PLEASURE is anything that satisfies our basic human needs. This comprises eating, drinking, sex, and sleeping.

ENJOYMENT comes from the practice of a well-rehearsed skill. The skill could be anything from tennis to basketball to programming to business dealmaking to walking to looking around to listening to music. You see so many people who want to make a change in their lives, but can’t. Somebody on Hacker News recently said he wanted to work with water, but can’t stop being a programmer because he enjoys it so much. He’s addicted to the flow states.

The state of FLOW, also known as being in the zone, occurs when your level of skill meets an appropriate challenge. When you are in FLOW you are firing on all cylinders; you achieve incredible performance, feel great, and forget your sense of “self”.

Did you know that the human mind can only process about 7 discrete pieces of information at any given moment? If you want to promote encoding/enhanced memory recall/high task performance, then you should disable your “background tasks” and give something your full attention. If you’re trying to listen to someone and 1/7 of your resources are involved in thinking about what you want for lunch, then you aren’t going to be dedicated fully to listening to them and your conversational performance will suffer. Stress is another thing that eats up mental resources, though I’m not sure how, exactly – I can’t quite model it by saying “stress eats up 2/7 of your 7 resources.” Also relevant: when we become more proficient (skilled) at something, deciphering it takes fewer resources. So if I am a chess expert and I look at a chess board, I am going to be able to notice more things, because I “chunk” different pieces into memory. Something that costs you 3 bits might only cost me 1 bit.

So complete absorption leads to flow, that great feeling, because all your resources are dedicated to it: the task is precisely challenging enough to engage all of your resources, and nothing more. Since all of your resources are engaged in the task at hand, you no longer feel self-conscious because there’s no “bit” available to mull over your ego or self-image.

Flow also creates an ordering of your consciousness. Since you have no ego, your thinking is more logical. Ordering of consciousness is intrinsically pleasant because it is similar to a state of self-esteem. Also, every time you experience flow, you become more complex as a person: you become more differentiated (because you are more skilled) yet also more integrated (because flow leads to loss of “self”.)

Csikszentmihalyi hypothesizes that S.M.A.R.T. goals can lead to flow. For more information, see this post on the what makes games fun.

Although Flow leads to happiness, it’s clear that American cultural values do not. Someone else on Hacker News commented:

Sure, [consumerism] is the way life is for many people, but … to think that Apple intentionally makes thousands of humans waste hours of their life doing something they hate.

The Apple marketing machine created a tribe, giving to the rise of superfans whose identity/self-image hinges on being one of the first to own a new product. I don’t know if it’s Apple you should really blame, though. You should blame our culture for allowing the media to manipulate us, brainwashing us, shaping the behavior to work jobs we hate so we can buy things so we can be happy. Media conditioning plays on our innate drives, associating positive possibilities (sex, social acceptance/popularity) with consumer products. Growing up in America gives you a certain set of engrained values that just DON’T WORK: they don’t order reality in an effective way (too much rationalization and cognitive dissonance, because if you really start to question things, you see that the system is fucked, and can no longer be a part of it) and they lead you towards a probably unhappy life, even if you do everything “right” (Ivy League college, high paying job, marriage, kids…etc. But watching TV, the #1 American pastime, is not real enjoyment because it is rarely a skillful activity!) However, even though the values are fucked, it’s much easier to just receive guidelines instead of having to think for yourself – that takes up so much energy.

It’s easy to just submit to the values of the state and consumerism; no thinking is involved, plus, everybody else is doing it, so something about it must be right [social proof]. Unfortunately, this does not work. Submitting to a religion can be helpful for a time (as they say it is the opiate of the masses); it can lead to a feeling of connectedness not unlike flow. Unfortunately, for the critical thinker, it is impossible to submit to a religion because religious doctrine creates too many logical conflicts and introduces too many opportunities for cognitive dissonance.

What to do to be happy and complex?? Try to practice skill in everything you do; when you do anything, give it your complete attention, and try to do it as best as you can. This even includes walking down the street. And I really recommend you read Flow.



Subscribe to the blog via email.

AwesomenessReminders: a great and hilarious way to show someone in your life that you care.
AwesomenessReminders is owned and operated by me, Zachary Burt.



  • Hugh S. Myers

    Given your description of flow, is it available to all of us on the bell curve or only those at and beyond a certain point?

  • http://twitter.com/kurikun kurikun

    Wow, before I even got down to the point in your article where you mention S.M.A.R.T. I was planning to ask if you had read any of Albert Ellis’s theories on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. I am loosely familiar with his program and I believe your plan to make an “App for That” is grand.
    You might integrate a pier review system. Where people can ask if the choice they are contemplating is truly rational. Crowd sourced feedback could be presented as percentages.
    Nice article.

  • http://donmcarthur.com/ Don McArthur

    If you have to ask you’ll never flow.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Csikszsentmihalyi suggests that Flow is available to beginners if the task requires only the most basic of skills.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Thanks, yes, I am planning a peer review system!

  • Winjer2k

    Ah, the luxuries of the Bourgeoisie

  • http://twitter.com/baritone Jeff Fields

    What sort of bourgeois luxury is denoted by being able to write several pages complaining about other people’s decisions to go buy a phone?

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    For the record, I defended the iPhone buyers.”Whatever man. That’s an unfair and negative value judgment. Everyone’s identity comes from somewhere. For some people it’s from being part of the elite Geek crowd. For other people it’s their sports team winning. For other people it’s their business making millions of dollars.”<http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1459312>

    Full disclosure, I’m also on my way in to a meeting to sell some software to an ad agency.

  • spiritual novice

    Really enjoyed your article. This is something I always want to remember. Thank you for this. Cheers!

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/QHHVYX4DZAVT53XMTF2CXRNO6M James Spada

    unless he is already in the flow, and flows to the point of not recognizing the lack of flow others experience.

  • Thomas

    How to be happy: make other people happy with your love.
    Sounds like flowing on opium, but it’s true.

    (I don’t call myself religious, but I am a believer of God. Funny thing: your story is almost exactly the same as the Bible’s story. But think about the ‘love’ part…)

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/QHHVYX4DZAVT53XMTF2CXRNO6M James Spada

    I would recommend checking out games people play by Eric Berne, if you haven’t already. Its a solid read.

    As far as the Ekman book, I was a little disappointed, feel like i should have just shelled out the money and went to his seminar.

    Thanks for the post, will add this blog to reader.

  • http://www.leftbraintorightbrain.com/ Scott Carleton

    Fantastic article. Worth the entire read. Puts into words a lot of things I’ve been thinking about lately.

  • Anonymous

    One of my favorite books! Once again you really distilled the concepts down beautifully. Well done!

    HAve you read Clay Shirkeys new book, Cognitive Surplus yet? I think you will enjoy it

  • Kindly

    I liked your article, however it has not convinced me to buy the book. To give something your complete attention is a delicate art and can not be achieved regularly by just trying at everything you do. This without the correct awareness can lead to a larger ego.

    Traditianal buddhists would say that mindfullness is the way to train to be in this state. It is also logical that If you can be completely immersed in the moment whilse doing nothing, then it will be easier to be immersed while doing something, no matter how mundane you percieve that thing to be. Modern CBT practice has also moved on to recommending mindfullness, especially to people who mentally try rationalise everything all the time.

  • NC

    Just don’t call people who use Apple technological geeks, in the past maybe they were, today every tech savvy person knows what a waste of money most of their products are.

  • http://www.facebook.com/benvanderbeek Ben VanderBeek

    I’m *really* looking forward to the web app to help combat automatic negative thoughts. Like you said this can change people’s lives.

  • Hugh S. Myers

    Given your description of flow, is it available to all of us on the bell curve or only those at and beyond a certain point?

  • http://twitter.com/kurikun kurikun

    Wow, before I even got down to the point in your article where you mention S.M.A.R.T. I was planning to ask if you had read any of Albert Ellis's theories on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. I am loosely familiar with his program and I believe your plan to make an “App for That” is grand.
    You might integrate a pier review system. Where people can ask if the choice they are contemplating is truly rational. Crowd sourced feedback could be presented as percentages.
    Nice article.

  • Mike

    So this is what you get from Eckhart Tolle’s pseudo-Buddhist pop spirituality! Apparently what you learned there is that the way you choose to live your life is awesome and filled with flow, and how other people live their lives is dumb and lame. You are letting go of the ego, and that makes you awesome? A classic case of what Chogyam Trungpa called spiritual materialism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_materialism

    You also make many theoretical mistakes about the nature of ego, taking the phrase “forget the ego” too literally. Lots of ordinary experiences entail the loss of the sense of self: sleeping, watching a movie, daydreaming, flow states, etc. Correcting irrationalities helps destroy the ego? I think you need to delve a little deeper than a few coffee table pop spirituality books, otherwise you are just reinforcing your pre-existing beliefs and biases.

  • http://donmcarthur.com/ Don McArthur

    If you have to ask you'll never flow.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Csikszsentmihalyi suggests that Flow is available to beginners if the task requires only the most basic of skills.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Thanks, yes, I am planning a peer review system!

  • Winjer2k

    Ah, the luxuries of the Bourgeoisie

  • http://twitter.com/baritone Jeff Fields

    What sort of bourgeois luxury is denoted by being able to write several pages complaining about other people's decisions to go buy a phone?

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    For the record, I defended the iPhone buyers.

    “Whatever man. That's an unfair and negative value judgment. Everyone's identity comes from somewhere. For some people it's from being part of the elite Geek crowd. For other people it's their sports team winning. For other people it's their business making millions of dollars.”

    <http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1459312>

  • spiritual novice

    Really enjoyed your article. This is something I always want to remember. Thank you for this. Cheers!

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Very interesting criticism. I do think that correcting irrationalities helps destroy the ego. Please recommend some books for me to read, I promise that I will do my best to read them and share my evolved perspective with everyone.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/QHHVYX4DZAVT53XMTF2CXRNO6M James Spada

    unless he is already in the flow, and flows to the point of not recognizing the lack of flow others experience.

  • Thomas

    How to be happy: make other people happy with your love.
    Sounds like flowing on opium, but it's true.

    (I don't call myself religious, but I am a believer of God. Funny thing: your story is almost exactly the same as the Bible's story. But think about the 'love' part…)

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Bummer that you didn’t like the Ekman book – I am only partway through it – it seems interesting to me, albeit a little wordy. He has training classes available online for as little as $30, let me know if you end up checking them out before I do…

    I actually link to Games People Play in this post! The underlined “game” is a link to the book on Amazon, http://www.amazon.com/dp/0345410033/?tag=httpwwwhiph02-20 =)

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/QHHVYX4DZAVT53XMTF2CXRNO6M James Spada

    I would recommend checking out games people play by Eric Berne, if you haven't already. Its a solid read.

    As far as the Ekman book, I was a little disappointed, feel like i should have just shelled out the money and went to his seminar.

    Thanks for the post, will add this blog to reader.

  • http://www.leftbraintorightbrain.com/ Scott Carleton

    Fantastic article. Worth the entire read. Puts into words a lot of things I've been thinking about lately.

  • http://twitter.com/shawnkolodny Shawn Kolodny

    One of my favorite books! Once again you really distilled the concepts down beautifully. Well done!

    HAve you read Clay Shirkeys new book, Cognitive Surplus yet? I think you will enjoy it

  • Kindly

    I liked your article, however it has not convinced me to buy the book. To give something your complete attention is a delicate art and can not be achieved regularly by just trying at everything you do. This without the correct awareness can lead to a larger ego.

    Traditianal buddhists would say that mindfullness is the way to train to be in this state. It is also logical that If you can be completely immersed in the moment whilse doing nothing, then it will be easier to be immersed while doing something, no matter how mundane you percieve that thing to be. Modern CBT practice has also moved on to recommending mindfullness, especially to people who mentally try rationalise everything all the time.

  • Mike

    I recommend The Myth of Freedom by Chogyam Trungpa.

  • NC

    Just don't call people who use Apple technological geeks, in the past maybe they were, today every tech savvy person knows what a waste of money most of their products are.

  • http://www.facebook.com/benvanderbeek Ben VanderBeek

    I'm *really* looking forward to the web app to help combat automatic negative thoughts. Like you said this can change people's lives.

  • Mike

    So this is what you get from Eckhart Tolle's pseudo-Buddhist pop spirituality! Apparently what you learned there is that the way you choose to live your life is awesome and filled with flow, and how other people live their lives is dumb and lame. You are letting go of the ego, and that makes you awesome? A classic case of what Chogyam Trungpa called spiritual materialism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_materialism

    You also make many theoretical mistakes about the nature of ego, taking the phrase “forget the ego” too literally. Lots of ordinary experiences entail the loss of the sense of self: sleeping, watching a movie, daydreaming, flow states, etc. Correcting irrationalities helps destroy the ego? I think you need to delve a little deeper than a few coffee table pop spirituality books, otherwise you are just reinforcing your pre-existing beliefs and biases.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Very interesting criticism. I do think that correcting irrationalities helps destroy the ego. Please recommend some books for me to read, I promise that I will do my best to read them and share my evolved perspective with everyone.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Bummer that you didn't like the Ekman book – I am only partway through it – it seems interesting to me, albeit a little wordy. He has training classes available online for as little as $30, let me know if you end up checking them out before I do…

    I actually link to Games People Play in this post! The underlined “game” is a link to the book on Amazon, http://www.amazon.com/dp/0345410033/?tag=httpww… =)

  • Mike

    I recommend The Myth of Freedom by Chogyam Trungpa.

  • Victoriaburt

    Interesting and Well Written.

  • Victoriaburt

    Interesting and Well Written.

  • http://www.ribbonfarm.com Venkat

    I read Flow about a decade ago, and curiously have been getting less impressed by its ideas every passing year. It has morphed into the whole positive psychology movement, which I am very ambivalent about.

    I don’t think flow leads to happiness, unless you define happiness to be the state flow produces.

    If you look beyond the positive-psych lit, whose conclusions on happiness I think are somewhat suspect at a philosophical level, there is only one really robust conclusion about happiness. That happiness is primarily a social thing. Strong relationships correlate strongly to happiness.

    Flow actually is about a feeling of mastery which eventually leads towards power, which is the antithesis of happiness in a sense.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Csikszentmihalyi does define happiness to be the state flow produces. It may be more of a Buddhist definition, though – the absence of suffering – rather than an MDMA-like experience of ecstasy.

    Apparently, in The How of Happiness (http://amzn.to/aq0Ygg), Sonja Lyubomirsky offers a series of scientific (peer-reviewed, hopefully double-blind, etc.) studies on activities proven to boost “happiness”. Gratitude journaling is one of them; exercise is another. I plan on reviewing it for my blog eventually.

    I am INTERESTED in your argument about happiness being primarily a social thing and need to hear more before I reply; I am curious whence you drew your conclusions.

    And this comment – “Flow actually is about a feeling of mastery which eventually leads towards power, which is the antithesis of happiness in a sense” – does not make sense to me at all:

    1) What kind of “power” are you talking about?
    2) It seems as if you are defining happiness in the negative [there's got to be a "philosophical term" for defining something in the negative] – you define it as the opposite of power – but a lot of people would disagree with you, as learned helplessness is popularly equated with depression whereas a sense of autonomy [c.f. Dan Pink, e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc is currently equated with happiness.

    As always, if you have book recommendations, I’d like to check them out.

  • http://www.ribbonfarm.com Venkat

    I read Flow about a decade ago, and curiously have been getting less impressed by its ideas every passing year. It has morphed into the whole positive psychology movement, which I am very ambivalent about.

    I don't think flow leads to happiness, unless you define happiness to be the state flow produces.

    If you look beyond the positive-psych lit, whose conclusions on happiness I think are somewhat suspect at a philosophical level, there is only one really robust conclusion about happiness. That happiness is primarily a social thing. Strong relationships correlate strongly to happiness.

    Flow actually is about a feeling of mastery which eventually leads towards power, which is the antithesis of happiness in a sense.

  • http://www.ribbonfarm.com Venkat

    If you accept a sort of popular/self-reported version of well being as happiness, there are studies that show that having friends, being married etc. all boost happiness. They seem to be the only things that reliably correlate. Those who “achieve” a lot (generative adults in terms of developmental psychologists) are typically not happy until they also engage in “giving back” type community life.

    The whole problem with the psychology of happiness is that happiness is NOT a psychological concept. It was co-opted from philosophy by the likes of William James at the turn of the 20th century. There is no meaningful frame of reference within psychology to allow you to define it in a rich way, and the connotations of the term within positive psychology are worryingly close to a normative rather than descriptive concept. James was aware of the problem, since his book “the varieties of religious experience” straddles philosophy and psychology. Unlike James and his contemporaries, the modern gang is not cautious, and therefore ends up normatively describing, prescribing and force-fitting people into a single model of happiness. They don’t talk about the philosophical foundations of their notion of happiness (other than loosely and non-rigorously through sloppy references to mystic literature, a la Maslow). The only ones who worry about the philosophical roots (and therefore, are careful about what they say about happiness), are a few narrative-psychological researchers like George Vaillant and Dan McAdams. As you might expect, they don’t offer definitions of happiness, but DO critique simple-minded definitions (implicit or explicit) in others’ work.

    I blogged about this problem several months ago (the post has a bunch of links, and I have more filed away…)

    Now about happiness v. power. The idea that the two are antipodes is a philosophical one, and Nietzsche and Hegel are probably the ones most responsible for clarifying how and why. In both their philosophies, based on the master-slave model, the slave self-actualizes through work, which gives him self-mastery, and a defense against the power of the master. This is a complex idea that I can’t easily summarize in a comment, but the basic concept is that to be free, you must first become an individual. Nietzsche concluded that seeking happiness was not compatible with seeking power (“will to power”). Ergo, seeking happiness means staying away from power, = slave morality/philosophy = communitarian morality/philosophy.

    I realize this is a very quick sketch of the argument. I plan to elaborate on it in the next post in the GP series :) . Within that framework, happiness-seeking is a loser motivation, while power-seeking is a sociopath motivation. It’s one or the other, and you have to choose. At least for normal people. Whether Buddha-like figures managed to transcend the tradeoff or merely fooled themselves that they had, is a different question.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Csikszentmihalyi does define happiness to be the state flow produces. It may be more of a Buddhist definition, though – the absence of suffering – rather than an MDMA-like experience of ecstasy.

    Apparently, in The How of Happiness (http://amzn.to/aq0Ygg), Sonja Lyubomirsky offers a series of scientific (peer-reviewed, hopefully double-blind, etc.) studies on activities proven to boost “happiness”. Gratitude journaling is one of them; exercise is another. I plan on reviewing it for my blog eventually.

    I am INTERESTED in your argument about happiness being primarily a social thing and need to hear more before I reply; I am curious whence you drew your conclusions.

    And this comment – “Flow actually is about a feeling of mastery which eventually leads towards power, which is the antithesis of happiness in a sense” – does not make sense to me at all:

    1) What kind of “power” are you talking about?
    2) It seems as if you are defining happiness in the negative [there's got to be a "philosophical term" for defining something in the negative] – you define it as the opposite of power – but a lot of people would disagree with you, as learned helplessness is popularly equated with depression whereas a sense of autonomy [c.f. Dan Pink, e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc is currently equated with happiness.

    As always, if you have book recommendations, I'd like to check them out.

  • http://www.ribbonfarm.com Venkat

    If you accept a sort of popular/self-reported version of well being as happiness, there are studies that show that having friends, being married etc. all boost happiness. They seem to be the only things that reliably correlate. Those who “achieve” a lot (generative adults in terms of developmental psychologists) are typically not happy until they also engage in “giving back” type community life.

    The whole problem with the psychology of happiness is that happiness is NOT a psychological concept. It was co-opted from philosophy by the likes of William James at the turn of the 20th century. There is no meaningful frame of reference within psychology to allow you to define it in a rich way, and the connotations of the term within positive psychology are worryingly close to a normative rather than descriptive concept. James was aware of the problem, since his book “the varieties of religious experience” straddles philosophy and psychology. Unlike James and his contemporaries, the modern gang is not cautious, and therefore ends up normatively describing, prescribing and force-fitting people into a single model of happiness. They don't talk about the philosophical foundations of their notion of happiness (other than loosely and non-rigorously through sloppy references to mystic literature, a la Maslow). The only ones who worry about the philosophical roots (and therefore, are careful about what they say about happiness), are a few narrative-psychological researchers like George Vaillant and Dan McAdams. As you might expect, they don't offer definitions of happiness, but DO critique simple-minded definitions (implicit or explicit) in others' work.

    I blogged about this problem several months ago (the post has a bunch of links, and I have more filed away…)

    Now about happiness v. power. The idea that the two are antipodes is a philosophical one, and Nietzsche and Hegel are probably the ones most responsible for clarifying how and why. In both their philosophies, based on the master-slave model, the slave self-actualizes through work, which gives him self-mastery, and a defense against the power of the master. This is a complex idea that I can't easily summarize in a comment, but the basic concept is that to be free, you must first become an individual. Nietzsche concluded that seeking happiness was not compatible with seeking power (“will to power”). Ergo, seeking happiness means staying away from power, = slave morality/philosophy = communitarian morality/philosophy.

    I realize this is a very quick sketch of the argument. I plan to elaborate on it in the next post in the GP series :) . Within that framework, happiness-seeking is a loser motivation, while power-seeking is a sociopath motivation. It's one or the other, and you have to choose. At least for normal people. Whether Buddha-like figures managed to transcend the tradeoff or merely fooled themselves that they had, is a different question.

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/07/the-myth-of-freedom/ The Myth of Freedom — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] and the Art of PokerCompeting with Greyhound: My NYC/Chicago Bus Thought ExperimentBlack Swan MagnetRELEASE YOURSELF TO THE CHURCH! TO THE STATE! TO APPLE CORPORATION! Or Flow.Operating Manual for Spaceship EarthDelivering Happiness: The New Tribal Business EthicsThe Tao of [...]

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt
  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Buddhism has been historically used as a control strategy, though if you read this post you will note that it is perhaps more “opiate” than other mass religions

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Buddhism has been historically used as a control strategy, though if you read this post you will note that it is perhaps more “opiate” than other mass religions :)

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt
  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt
  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt

    Buddhism has been historically used as a control strategy, though if you read this post <http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/05/the-neurosci…> you will note that it is perhaps more “opiate” than other mass religions

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/ Zachary Burt
  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/07/cognitive-surplus-television-and-social-apps/ Cognitive Surplus, Television and Social Apps — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] and the Art of PokerCompeting with Greyhound: My NYC/Chicago Bus Thought ExperimentBlack Swan MagnetRELEASE YOURSELF TO THE CHURCH! TO THE STATE! TO APPLE CORPORATION! Or Flow.Operating Manual for Spaceship [...]

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/08/some-zacharyburt-com-updates/ Some ZacharyBurt.com Updates — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] http://www.EndAnts.com – a site to help you end Automatic Negative Thoughts (ANTs). As I have previously mentioned here on ZacharyBurt.com, negative thinking is bad for our emotional health. The site uses a [...]

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/11/what-makes-two-people-click/ What makes two people click? — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] you remember when I talked about Cziksentmihalyi’s Flow? It is that wonderful state that occurs when our mastery of a skill is met with an appropriate [...]

  • http://www.zacharyburt.com/2010/12/how-to-prevent-choking-under-pressure-and-how-to-force-it-in-others/ How to prevent choking under pressure, and how to force it in others — Zachary Burt's Blog

    [...] just happens through your body. You’re able to get “into the zone”, also known as flow. Often times, you won’t even be aware of when you’re doing it or how you’re doing [...]

  • http://www.fertibella.com/get-pregnant/fertility-medicine fertility medicine

    Jeremy Burt goes up for two points in Plainfield North’s 74-70 loss Friday at Plainfield Central. Plainfield North was slapped with an intentional foul and a technical foul, which turned into four points …

  • http://www.fertibella.com/get-pregnant/fertility-medicine fertility medicine

    Jeremy Burt goes up for two points in Plainfield North’s 74-70 loss Friday at Plainfield Central. Plainfield North was slapped with an intentional foul and a technical foul, which turned into four points …

Back to top